Frequent Links
Featured Stories
-
Review: Keiko Mecheri Bespoke Amber Mirabilis
20 May 2012 5:45 AM | No Comments -
Bond No. 9 Hamptons: Breezy, bright and light.
17 May 2012 11:00 AM | 1 Comment -
Keiko Mecheri Bespoke Collection: Canyon Dreams
15 May 2012 11:00 AM | No Comments -
Montale Aoud Leather: The tiger you want to tame.
10 May 2012 10:55 AM | No Comments -
Bond No. 9 Saks Fifth Avenue for Him: Review
08 May 2012 10:50 AM | No Comments -
Review: Bond No. 9 New Haarlem, a gourmand delight and fan favorite.
20 April 2012 7:00 AM | No Comments -
Review: Guerlain Spiritueuse Double Vanille
18 April 2012 7:00 AM | 2 Comments -
Review: Creed Royal Oud – Fashionably late to the party.
13 April 2012 7:00 AM | No Comments
-
Categories
Archives
Pages
Reference Links
- (Not) PMO-in-a-Can
- Basenotes
- Bois de Jasmin (Blog)
- Brooklyn Fragrance Lover
- Cafleurebon (Blog)
- Fragrances at Amazon.com
- Fragrantica
- Lucky Scent
- Min New York
- Now Smell This (Blog)
- Perfume Shrine (Blog)
- Perfume Smellin' Things (Blog)
- Salon de Parfum (Blog)
- Tauer Perfume Blog
- This Blog Really Stinks
- Three Noseketeers (Blog-Spanish)
Purchase Online
neroli Archive
-
Safari by Ralph Lauren (Review): A trip down memory lane
This isn’t as much a review as a walk back through time to a slightly different period and an ever-so-slightly different piece from the period. After some research and reading, I acquired Safari for Men by Ralph Lauren, one of their pieces from the early 1990′s. And my search was about more than 90′s vintage [...] -
Creed Royal Service: Review & First Impressions
My own sources at Creed advised me months ago to expect new releases by the end of the year. As time unfolded, we were advised that one of those would be a special 250th Anniversary Limited Edition with only 300 copies to be released, each signed by Olivier & Erwin Creed. Now that the press is out, [...] -
Gucci Guilty Intense Pour Homme (Review)
I should mention from the top that I dislike the marketing implications of “intense” in a product name. It suggests an “ordinary version” and, provided you can handle it, an “intense version”, as if there’s something missing or weak about the regular (non-intensely named) product. Or that something must be so wrong about the standard [...]









